But while the prosecutor's office said that does not consider itself responsible, since all responsibility in this case has the investigative committee, which is a separate legal entity.
Moreover, as noted in the Moscow prosecutor's office, was suspected of committing the offense "officials" Lilyuhin, but in connection with the death of his investigation into the incident was discontinued.
Statements by the Moscow prosecutor's office were discussed at the meeting Zamoskvoretskogo court on December 17. The court began its consideration of two lawsuits filed by relatives of hostages at the Dubrovka, in which prosecutors were accused of looting.
The plaintiffs need to recover from prosecutors over one million rubles. Their lawyer Igor Trunov has said that the objections raised by the prosecutor's office, in particular, the desire to shift responsibility for investigating committee unfounded.
As noted Trunov, at the time of the offense was not the Investigations Committee, and prosecutors is an appropriate defendant. He also added that in the near future similar actions may file other affected during the hostage-taking at the Dubrovka.
For its part, according to the agency Interfax, "The Investigation Committee under the Russian Prosecutor's Office filed criminal charges of theft of money belonging to the hostages' Nord-Osta, perfect for the period from 29 October to 5 December 2002 from inside the theater center.
Recall that the theater center on Dubrovka was captured by terrorists in October 2002. During the operation to free hostages killed 130 people, injured more than 700.
No comments:
Post a Comment