Scandal reports spending British MPs over the ink.

KommentariiNepredvidennye rashody21.05.2009Britanskie legislators excellent save from nalogoplatelschikovPalata communities, the British Parliament on its website published the official documents of the spending MPs, paid from the treasury, which provoked a tremendous political scandal. But the British company were indignant that much of the information is not available for scanned documents, as well as black zakrashena tsvetom.Tak article about it in The Daily Mail called "For what idiots they are taking us?", A headline in The Times states: "Freedom access to information, drowned in the sea of ink. "scandal erupted when British taxpayers know how much MPs are spending their money on their own needs, but in particular - for what purposes. At the same time as the information was subjected to unnecessary spending most rigorous censorship. In particular, the published documents could not know that a Government Minister Margaret Thatcher, Sir Peter Viggins,!
spent 1645 pounds on the house for the ducks on his private prudu.Takzhe blacks were zakrasheny, for example, addresses members of parliament, which does not track those of They have the right to compensation for the cost of the second housing so as to derive maximum benefit from it (in particular, many MPs have requested that the money for one of his home, on the other). In doing so, the journalists The Daily Telegraph, initiated the scandal, copies of the documents originally came in intact. This is well known that the Finance Minister Alistair Darling for four years, compensate for the cost of four houses, but because of censorship test this nelzya.Takzhe were allowed to hide the painting, photocopies of checks, the names of staff members of parliament, the names of hotels, where they lived at the taxpayers' money, bank account numbers, letters to the staff of the House of Commons, and so dalee.Premer Gordon Brown told journalists that do not understand why some of !
the information from its financial statements had been spendin!
g around
skryta.Skandal parliamentarians provoked the resignation of many of Brown's government. Deputies have been deprived of most financial poblazhek, control over their spending was tightened and, in addition, many have promised to return the spent money in the treasury. Some politicians said that they would not again stand for parliament.
The biggest blow has been inflicted on the reputation of the Labor Party, headed by the Prime Minister: she lost the local elections across the country. And supporters and opponents of Gordon Brown, who became the most unpopular prime minister in British history, have repeatedly called on him to offer to resign, but he always answered the refusal.